Information and Advisory Note Number 13                                                Back to menu

Supplementary Feeding

1. Introduction

1.1 This information and advice aims to provide farmers with guidance on the environmental impact of supplementary feeding in extensive livestock systems and how it can be minimised.

1.2 Supplementary feeding is a fundamental part of livestock management. In extensive systems it is aimed at maintaining stock condition through winter months (and other periods of harsh conditions) when there is little available grazing, or where the available grazing is of poor quality and requires supplementing.

1.3 Feeding frequently takes place in or around buildings or away from buildings. It is winter feeding away from buildings that has the most significant direct impact on the natural heritage, particularly on or adjacent to semi-natural habitats. It is this aspect that the information and advice note covers. Mention is also made of water provision for livestock.


2. Methods of Supplementary Feeding

2.1 Supplementary feeds consist principally of carbohydrates and minerals. Winter feeds used outside include,

Feeding of hay or silage is sometimes termed "fothering", and is distinct from the use of roots, concentrates, feed blocks and licks.

2.2 Preferred supplementary feeding sites tend to be those that are,

2.3 As a consequence of these criteria, farmers frequently select sheltered woodlands or hard, thin-soiled, dry rocky outcrops. These are often of ecological (and sometimes archaeological) interest.

2.4 The method of feeding affects its environmental impact. Feeding hay or silage in bales or ring-feeders and feeding hay in net racks can concentrate livestock, increasing the potential for environmental damage. Scattering feed (e.g. hay or turnips) spreads the impact - though for hay there is a risk of fouling and trampling of the feed. Bagged concentrates are fed in troughs which are readily movable. Mineral blocks or licks can be distributed easily and require no troughs or racks.

2.5 Feed sites fall into 3 categories:


Be aware of adjacent sites of interest onto which stock may also drift, causing poaching or over-grazing.

4.4 Consider the types of feeding site outlined at 2.5 above. Wherever possible choose sites which can be rotated frequently enough to avoid damage before it occurs, or sites which can be sacrificed with minimal damage to the natural heritage. Rotate sites as often as is feasible during or between years.

4.5 Never put supplementary feed on or in the immediate vicinity of archaeological features.

4.6 If hay is fed on a semi-natural habitat, sacrificial areas may be more desirable due to the risk of cross-dunging which might introduce seeds of aggressive species, to the detriment of the natural herbage. Whether feeding areas should be sacrificial or rotated is determined by climate, nature of the ground, and whether hay or silage is being fed.

4.7 Change the site of feed blocks each time a new block is put out. When a feed block is replaced it should be at least 100m away. Where hay is provided the distribution point should be moved at least 250m from the feed block.

4.8 Where the feed site has to be amongst heather, blocks should be placed in vigorous heather. Avoid very young or old, degenerate heather which recover less successfully from intense grazing and trampling. Avoid reusing sites until heather cover has been restored and the heather is growing vigorously, usually a minimum of 5 years, ideally aim for a 10-12 year rotation.

4.9 Once vegetation has been exhausted and the well-being of livestock is dependent on supplementary feed, consider in-wintering stock in sheds rather than degrading the vegetation further.

4.10 Supplementary feeding provides a mechanism to manipulate stock and to move them away from over-grazed sites towards areas in need of grazing. For example, the use of blocks to redistribute grazing on heather. This leads to more even utilisation of the vegetation.

4.11 Winter feeding of cattle on dense stands of bracken will assist with the control of the bracken which is susceptible to trampling,
particularly where followed by frost. This technique is valuable as long as:

4.12 Where practicable, feeding sites should be located away from footpaths in order to avoid poaching and fouling of the route.

4.13 Silage wrap should be recycled wherever possible. Packaging of bought-in feedstuffs needs to be disposed of carefully to avoid littering the countryside.


5. Water

5.1 Sheep do not have a significant requirement for water, but cattle do. Water provision can be from natural watercourses or waterbodies, ponds and troughs.

5.2 Water provision at troughs can result in problems similar to the poaching and fouling caused by supplementary feeding. Hard-standing sites should again be sought as an ideal. Clearly water troughs are fixed, so there is no option of rotation to minimise impact. Site selection is therefore very important.

5.3 Natural water supply or ponds for stock-watering are also susceptible to poaching and collapse of margins. This can cause,


5.4 Limited stock access to pond sides and watercourse margins can result in benefits such as


Further Information


Be aware of adjacent sites of interest onto which stock may also drift, causing poaching or over-grazing.

4.4 Consider the types of feeding site outlined at 2.5 above. Wherever possible choose sites which can be rotated frequently enough to avoid damage before it occurs, or sites which can be sacrificed with minimal damage to the natural herifage. Rotate sites as often as is feasible during or between years.

4.5 Never put supplementary feed on or in the immediate vicinity of archaeological features.

4.6 If hay is fed on a semi-natural habitat, sacrificial areas may be more desirable due to the risk of cross-dunging which might introduce seeds of aggressive species, to the detriment of the natural herbage. Whether feeding areas should be sacrificial or rotated is determined by climate, nature of the ground, and whether hay or silage is being fed.

4.7 Change the site of feed blocks each time a new block is put out When a feed block is replaced it should be at least 100m away. Where hay is provided the distribution point should be moved at least 250m from the feed block.

4.8 Where the feed site has to be amongst heather, blocks should be placed in vigorous heather. Avoid very young or old, degenerate heather which recover less successfully from intense grazing and trampling. Avoid reusing sites until heather cover has been restored and the heather is growing vigorously, usually a minimum of 5 years, ideally aim for a 10-12 year rotation.

4.9 Once vegetation has been exhausted and the well-being of livestock is dependent on supplementary feed, consider in-wintering stock in sheds rather than degrading the vegetation further.

4.10 Supplementary feeding provides a mechanism to manipulate stock and to move them away from over-grazed sites towards areas in need of grazing. For example, the use of blocks to redistribute grazing on heather. This leads to more even utilisation of the vegetation.

4.11 Winter feeding of cattle on dense stands of bracken will assist with the control of the bracken which is susceptible to trampling,
particularly where followed by frost. This technique is valuable as long as:

4.12 Where practicable, feeding sites should be located away from footpaths in order to avoid poaching and fouling of the route.

4.13 Silage wrap should be recycled wherever possible. Packaging of bought-in feedstuffs needs to be disposed of carefully to avoid littering the countryside.


 

5. Water

5.1 Sheep do not have a significant requirement for water, but cattle do. Water provision can be from natural watercourses or waterbodies, ponds and troughs.

5.2 Water provision at troughs can result in problems similar to the poaching and fouling caused by supplementary feeding. Hard-standing sites should again be sought as an ideal. Clearly water troughs are fixed, so there is no option of rotation to minimise impact. Site selection is therefore very important.

5.3 Natural water supply or ponds for stock-watering are also susceptible to poaching and collapse of margins. This can cause,


5.4 Limited stock access to pond sides and watercourse margins can result in benefits such as

 

Further reading and references,


Authors:


Contacts for advice and information:

Jeremy Roberts, Agriculture and Woodland Environments Branch (AWEB).

Daniel Gotts, AWEB

Scottish Natural Heritage
Research & Advisory Services Directorate
2 Anderson Place, Edinburgh, EH6 5NP
Tel: 0131 447 4784

 

 Back to menu